Do you know the difference between subscriber and contributor in APSense groups?

thanks bother pahilippe moisan

Imran, you copied my comment, this is plagiarism, not allowed at APSense, I click on the Report link for your comment.

@Terry B, I sort of was wondering why some group creators made subscriber the default role when joining their groups, I explain it in the text under the question, and I wanted to know if some of them might want to explain their position. Free members can be both, it depends on what the creator decides.

There is one thing free members can't do about groups, it's being able to create groups.

Ok well Learned something today

@Terry B, I sort of was wondering why some group creators made subscriber the default role when joining their groups, I explain it in the text under the question, and I wanted to know if some of them might want to explain their position. Free members can be both, it depends on what the creator decides.

There is one thing free members can't do about groups, it's being able to create groups.

subscriber don't have the ability to create a discussion, they will just read and place comments

one is a free membe one is a payed member

@Lido, copying comments is not allowed at APSense. Notice there's a "Report" link in each comment, this is for reporting abuse. I click on it now.

As for groups where subscriber is the default role, I almost always leave as soon as I join when I realize I am a subscriber.

Warren, a subscriber can add comments to discussions, so he's not just an observer, but he can't start discussions.

As for groups where subscriber is the default role, I almost always leave as soon as I join when I realize I am a subscriber.

A subscriber is just a observer and a contributor has the option to take part in what happens there. If I join a group (very few) as a subscriber and not much happens, I leave.

It depends much on the purpose where the group is set up for. Some are for discussions originally but is difficult at present due to the limitation of numbers of characters. Others are set up for centralizing information or just for advertising.

The number of group members makes less sense than the active members of a group. So reviewing every new members is the necessary job for you to build a successful group.

I Think Its all depends on Wincer, How He Can mange it.

That was the point, I wanted to get the attention of members to explain my point of view why it's not useful to have group members be subscribers.

Yes! I know the difference Philippe. I am totally agree with your point & suggestion.

Subscriber only can read discussions and write comments. Contributor may start a discussion in a group.