Let Know The Law and Mental Health
Today, mental health is a major problem. According to projections, 20% of the population will experience a mental health problem just in 2012. Anxiety and/or depression are the two mental health conditions that people experience the most frequently. This article explores the role of mental health in the legal system as well as techniques to increase optimism to deal with these problems.
A leading expert in the study of happiness Dr. Martin Seligman offers a different perspective on social media mental health lawyer than clinical psychology had in the past. Mental health was conceptualized as being about "What is Wrong With You" until the late 1990s. delivering a diagnosis to patients. "You're Depressed!" as an illustration. "You're Bi-Polar!" and "You're Anxious!" The DSM-IV served as the basis for these diagnoses. In 2013, the DSM-V will be made available. Clinical psychologists and psychiatrists used the DSM-IV to diagnose, "label," and treat patients based on the symptoms described for each psychological condition.
The "Positive Psychology" movement, which shifted away from the "labeling" or "diagnosing" approach and toward an emphasis on the positive, was made possible in large part by Seligman. He established the idea of optimism in his book Learned Optimism and provided research-based ways for increasing happiness and addicted to social media (specific methods are provided at the end of this article). Which is how individuals view both success and failure in their lives (more on this later in the article).
He continued by examining those who work in optimistic and pessimistic fields. He labeled the legal profession, for instance, as pessimistic! Why? Lawyers typically investigate who or what is at fault when people or organizations fail to act. Will you be made public? For instance, the mindset developed when working in a corporate atmosphere is one of making sure you don't make a mistake.
Creativity or ingenuity are frequently discouraged. A lot of lawyers tend to swiftly adopt and maintain a negative outlook. where people's labor is only acknowledged when a mistake is made. Is this a sustainable method of doing business? Will they be able to maintain this bad motivation throughout their career?
According to research on happiness, those who are optimists tend to be happier, live longer, and experience fewer mental health problems. The actual query is: How do you practice law while maintaining a positive outlook?
How you perceive your surroundings affects your optimism
For instance, if an optimist experiences a setback, they would see it as an isolated incident and not take the criticism personally, allowing their confidence in future work initiatives to remain unaffected. A pessimist will respond oppositely because they think that the criticism or unfortunate circumstance is a reflection of who they are as a person and something that they are unable to alter. This is referred to as a global character attribution in psychology.
How you respond to criticism is the first key to increasing your optimism in the legal profession, especially as a recent graduate. Try to credit it or explain it to yourself based on specific task aspects as opposed to general or relationship dynamics when it happens, which it will. Conversely, when good things happen to you at work. Instead of focusing on particular work areas, attribute them to general character attributes.
To summarize eight methods for increasing happiness and the effects of social media on mental health to wrap up this essay (as promised). As follows:
● Keep a gratitude journal
● Performing kind deeds
● Enjoy life's pleasures
● Salute a mentor
● Become forgiving
● Spend time and effort on family and friends.
● Take care of your health and learn coping mechanisms for difficult situations.
Many Americans experience mental illnesses that, like any other health issue, necessitate professional care, doctor visits, and prescription medication. If you receive medical coverage from your employer, all of your health-related needs must be covered. The goal of the Mental Health Parity Act was to ensure that both mental and physical health concerns had an equal yearly or lifetime expense cap. This also covers any other reserved rights that might be connected to a general medical expense.
Although this Act
contains a few exceptions, its main goal is to prevent insurance carriers and
businesses that may manage that insurance from reducing benefits for their
current or former employees depending on the type of disease they have. A
patient's life and happiness can be negatively impacted by mental issues just
as much as by physiological issues. An exemption for mental health-related
concerns regarding substance misuse or chemical dependency is one significant
restriction in this act.
Comments