A Short Guide on Software Security Testing Methodologies
Software security testing methodologies help analyze
and test the source code of a software product for vulnerabilities. The goal of
software security testing is to determine whether a software system is
secure and to find and fix any vulnerabilities before they are released into
the production environment.
This kind of software testing can be automated or
manual. Manual testing requires the tester to have hands-on experience with
software development frameworks, such as IDEs and continuous integration tools.
Security testers must also have an understanding of interpreted languages and
build systems. They must also have experience with security scanning tools and
secure SDLC.
Software Quality and Testing Essentials
You Need to Know:
DAST (dynamic application security testing) is a
technique that identifies and fixes vulnerabilities in software. This type of
testing is triggered by changes to a software's source code repository.
However, software
quality and testing can take a while to find and fix these
vulnerabilities. Hence, it's advisable to prioritize fixing them.
DAST tools can identify vulnerabilities that SAST
scans can't. In addition to that, DAST has a lower false positive rate than
SAST. For example, a DAST tool may be able to detect Cross-Site Scripting (XSS)
vulnerabilities that aren't visible in a SAST scan.
Using a combination of manual and automated code
reviews is a great way to achieve maximum security. It's a good idea to compare
the results of SAST and DAST to get a full understanding of the vulnerability
vulnerabilities.
While SAST tests all of the code required to compile
the application, DAST only scans the code that's actually running. Because of
this, it's not effective for detecting runtime-related security risks. Instead,
it's most effective for identifying and analyzing the vulnerabilities that are
present in the source code before it's compiled.
Black Box Testing & Gray Box
Testing:
Black box testing is an opaque approach to software
security testing. The tester adopts an outsider's perspective to
evaluate the security of the application. Since the only observable inputs are
those that the tester sees, the tester is forced to think like a real user,
instead of a code creator. By doing this, the tester can document any
application security issues that they discover.
Comments