Is The Arrival Time Travelling Hypothesis Viable?

In adopting the Sapir-Wharf concept, since the language utilized changes (even creates) thought, possibly the heptapods believe in a circular way. Maybe, by studying the aliens' language, people may have the ability to think like them. As global tensions escalate, amid fears the heptapods strategy to invade, the individual forces prepare to strike. Louise is awarded the heptapod speech completely, which changes her mind so that she could perceive time as 'curved'. On traveling within the heptapod boat, she's told that people will benefit the heptapods 3000 years in the future, which explains why they've come to world, so they can provide the people their speech, and so a round comprehension of time. This is what makes Arrival one of the best time travel movies. She predicts that General Shang also tells him to not assault the heptapods' alien vessel. She convinces him of speaking his spouse's death-bed words, he will talk to her in the future. The attack is called away, and the heptapods fly peacefully off. Ian admits his love for Louise, and also the audience realises the memories of the deceased girl come in the near future, Louise will wed Ian, they will have a daughter, that will die from an autoimmune disorder.

So where is the backward time travel? Nobody moves through the years, but that is not all it requires. The problem here isn't one of motion, but of causation. Let us say we've got two occasions, Ex1 and Ex2. They happen occasionally Time1 and Time2, let us say 3pm and 6pm respectively. In this instance, Ex1 is a action, I put a jar of water from the freezer. Ex2 is the consequence, the jar of water fractures. My placing the jar in the freezer 3pm induced the bottle to break at 6pm, though, clearly, the cause-effect coupling is mediated by a complex causal sequence: that the water gets colder, this induces a chemical shift (the water freezes into ice), the quantity within the jar expands, this places pressure on the glass of the bottle, the bottle shatters.

Our average, common-sense notion of causation is uni-directional, at almost any cause-effect matching, the reason has to come first. The majority of our scientific knowledge and technological accomplishments rely on this very basic premise. Nonetheless, in Arrival explained, the causal direction is the other way around, we now have quite a few of cause-effect couplings where the cause comes following the result. I will list the main ones:

The present-day heptapods become conscious of the (since they perceive time in a round manner, they've memories in the future (like Louise's memories of her daughter's passing). They come to earth to provide humankind their speech (Time1). The human's aid at Time2 resulted in the coming at Time1. These memories make her feel unhappy at the current (Time1). She recalls this at the current (Time1), and can state them to Shah to protect against the attack onto the heptapods. That is perhaps the best case of backward causation in Arrival, the only real way Louise could understand those words was since Shah explained them, later on.

If you are unhappy thinking regarding backward causation, we could even talk of the backward time-travel of advice, although no actual material moves backward, the data (Shah's spouse's words; the understanding of this daughter's departure; the understanding of humankind's useful activities) does traveling back in the future.